Dear core developers,

Are there any objections to move this to the trunk?

Cheers,
Bernhard

Am 01.01.2011 um 17:05 schrieb Bernhard Pieber:
> Dear Squeakers,
> 
> I went ahead with my proposal to move LayoutFrame from Morphic to Graphics and published new versions of both packages to the inbox. From the commit comment:
> 
> - moved LayoutFrame from Morphic-Layout to Graphics-Primitives because it is not specific to Morphic, i.e. it has no references to it and is perfectly usable - and used - by MVC only UIs. This also fixes PackageDependencyTest>>#testSUnitGUI.
> 
> Graphics-bp.173 should be loaded before Morphic-bp.505.
> 
> I kindly ask you core developers to consider moving it to the trunk.
> 
> Happy New Year!
> 
> Bernhard
> 
> Am 23.12.2010 um 19:37 schrieb Bernhard Pieber:
>> I am afraid I broke #testSUnitGUI when I improved the resize behavior of the Test Runner. Therefore I want to fix it. I used LayoutFrame for this which currently is in Morphic. Therefore SUnitGUI suddenly depends on Morphic which it should not because it uses ToolBuilder.
>> 
>> I think the right fix is to move LayoutFrame out of Morphic because it is not at all specific to Morphic. It is perfectly usable in MVCs UIs. And I guess it is also used there. The only question is where to move it? I think the best place would be the Graphics-Primitives class category in the Graphics package. This is where Point and Rectangle are. I tried it and it fixes the dependency test without breaking others. What do you think? I would like some feedback before I commit it to the inbox.