On 7 January 2011 14:24, Lawson English <lenglish5 at cox.net> wrote:

> Once again, it seems like the Squeak community will need to approach Steve
> Jobs concerning these issues, using as many avenues as possible (e.g. Alan
> Kay letter, etc). The strategy used for the iPhone may or may not work, but
> it seems the only course of action.
>
> Lawson
>
> [snip]

>
> # 6.3
>> #
>> # Apps that do not use system provided items, such as buttons and
>> # icons, correctly and as described in the Apple Macintosh Human
>> # Interface Guidelines will be rejected
>>
>> # 6.4
>> #
>> # Apple and our customers place a high value on simple, refined,
>> # creative, well thought through interfaces. They take more work but
>> # are worth it. Apple sets a high bar. If your user interface is complex
>> # or less than very good it may be rejected
>>
>
I don't think we need to worry about these last two, given the applications
that are already getting through: http://readthefuckinghig.tumblr.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20110107/bccec97b/attachment.htm