[squeak-dev] The Trunk: KernelTests-cmm.173.mcz
Levente Uzonyi
leves at elte.hu
Fri Jan 7 18:34:55 UTC 2011
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Chris Muller wrote:
>
>> Hmmm.. Levente was right, it didn't work, but I'm still really not
>> sure why..! Why can't we have an addition followed by removal in the
>> same update?
>
> Because there are two branches which will be merged automatically. Your
> branch doesn't add the FloatConsistencyTests, but the other branch does, so
> it appears in the merged version.
>
>>
>> Anyway, does trunk have a reverse gear? I went ahead and moved
>> KernelTests-ar.171 and 172 to the Inbox, so we can merge them back in
>> to trunk once it represents 4.3.
>>
>> I hope this puts trunk back on on the 4.2 track.
>
> This is a really bad idea, because all trunk images that have those packages
> loaded are now in an inconsistent state. Also the version number won't
> identify the exact set of packages in the image, because different images
> with the same version number can co-exist now.
>
> The proper way to do this is to:
> - move the versions ar.171 and 172 to the Trunk
> - update your image
> - remove all the stuff that you don't want to see in the image by hand
> - save a new version to the Trunk with those changes
>
> I'll do this ASAP.
It's done in KernelTests-ul.173. Btw where did KernelTests-cmm.173 go?
It's not in the Trunk.
Levente
>
>
> Levente
>
>>
>> - Chris
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:30 AM, <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>>> Chris Muller uploaded a new version of KernelTests to project The Trunk:
>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/KernelTests-cmm.173.mcz
>>>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>
>>> Name: KernelTests-cmm.173
>>> Author: cmm
>>> Time: 7 January 2011, 10:29:46.085 am
>>> UUID: e596c528-28a9-4198-82d6-6a69cee1ca33
>>> Ancestors: KernelTests-cmm.169
>>>
>>> Resaving to gain highest version # for trunk update process.
>>>
>>> =============== Diff against KernelTests-cmm.169 ===============
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|