Sorry, was not my intention!  I have updated the config, and

(ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser project version: '1.2.3') load

is now loading in Squeak4.2-10779-alpha.

Maybe It has not the last version of each package, and it needs to be
updated.

Cheers!
Guille

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:

>
> Quoting Michael Davies <mykdavies+squeak at gmail.com<mykdavies%2Bsqueak at gmail.com>
> >:
>
>  Hi all,
>>
>> I just noticed a problem with the script in the 4.2 beta (and I assume in
>> 4.1).
>>
>> The line
>>
>> ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform:
>> #lastVersion)
>> load: #( Dev ).
>>
>>  fails in
>>
>> MetacelloFetchingMCSpecLoader(MetacelloCommonMCSpecLoader)>>retryingResolvePackageSpecReferences:gofer:
>> with error message: 'Could not resolve: OB-Morphic [OB-Morphic-cwp.117] in
>> /Users/mike/Documents/Development/squeak/Squeak4.2beta/package-cache
>> http://source.wiresong.ca/ob'.
>>
>> This script appears to have been working fine in December (
>> http://forum.world.st/loading-Shout-into-trunk-td3071889.html)
>>
>> Metacello makes my head spin so I can't even understand what's gone wrong,
>> let alone how to resolve this problem.
>>
>
> The script tries to load the latest version which is 1.2.3. It uses
> baseline 1.2.1. The specification for #squeakCommon in
> ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser >> #baseline121: is polluted with Pharo specific
> stuff (starting from ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser-GuillermoPolito.72), so
> Metacello is looking for Squeak related packages in Pharo repositories.
>
> You can use this script to load OB until someone updates the configuration:
> Installer ss project: 'MetacelloRepository'; install:
> 'ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser'.
> ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser) project perform: #version:
> with: '1.2') load: #(Dev).
>
> Note that the configuration doesn't load the latest version of the
> packages, because some of them are not compatible with Squeak anymore. If we
> would like to keep using (an up-to-date version of) OB, then we have to make
> it Squeak compatible again. Either by cooperating with the current
> developers or if that's not possible, by forking it.
>
>
> Levente
>
>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20110111/9f89d388/attachment.htm