[squeak-dev] Re: Possible Background fix
Juan Vuletich
juan at jvuletich.org
Thu Jan 27 13:09:24 UTC 2011
Mirko Kapps wrote:
>
> Well, the dependency (and possible loading error) was one of the
> reasons behind my "Color or gradient as fall-back" idea. I /think/ I
> understand why depending on external files isn't good with an image
> based system, but OTOH, I also understand Casey's point of keeping the
> image small.
>
> Since my latest version of Theme>>setBackground: actually supports all
> of this, you could just include Themes which have at most a small
> image included in the image, but people can still set external files
> as the background (at least I like to have that). (am I the only one
> who gets confused with picture image vs. Smalltalk image? ;-) )
>
> If my last #setBackground: version has any chance of inclusion, just
> tell me what you don't like about it or how it could be advanced/made
> better and I see if I can do it. :-)
>
> Kindest Regards
> Mirko
I suggest moving the method to PasteUpMorph, and exiting with '^self '
instead of '^nil', as it is usual in Smalltalk.
Mhhh... There's something else. If you give a Form it is tiled, but if
you give a file name, it is stretched... Maybe someone wants to stretch
a Form, or tile a file name...
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|