On 14.07.2011, at 19:11, Colin Putney wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I ran the snippet below in a freshly downloaded trunk image. It found a couple of differences:
>> 
>> - Monticello is dirty because of the Mock category
>> - FlexibleVocabularies is dirty because its empty -Info category was removed
>> - Collections is dirty because there is an unpackaged method, WeakRegistry class>>migrateOldRegistries
>> 
>> These discrepancies should be corrected before the release, but does anybody have an idea why this happened?
> 
> Well, the first one is easy - running Monticello's test suite will
> dirty the package. This is a hassle, but I haven't found a way to
> prevent it that's not even more of a hassle. If you try to look at the
> changes, it'll tell you there aren't any and mark the package clean.
> 
> Colin

Nope. That's what my snippet does - look through all changes and mark the packages accordingly. This one *is* dirty.

- Bert -