[squeak-dev] smalltalk evolution
Kamil Tomsik
info at tomsik.cz
Wed Jun 1 08:49:08 UTC 2011
I'm not saying they're not useful, but they're usually part of some
internal DSL,
why not introduce full-blown DSL? (for math, func programming, whatever
else)
When using internal DSLs you have to switch your mind to different
language anyway,
why not represent it in code in a different way too?
I've written few internal DSLs when I was doing Java, and it always felt
like "ew. wtf? is this java?" with need for careful inspecting. And it
always
decreased code-readability, but this can be subjective (as everything).
Dne Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:38:31 +0200 Stéphane Rollandin
<lecteur at zogotounga.net> napsal(a):
>> 1.) binary messages make sense only for math. I've never implemented
>> even
>> one binary message, have you? (for non-math things)
>
> 49 of them for this package only:
> http://www.zogotounga.net/comp/squeak/functionaltalk.htm
>
> (see at the bottom of the page)
>
>
> Stef
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|