On 14.06.2011, at 09:31, Colin Putney wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> What would be nice though is pursuing the idea of alternative UI kits in Squeak - being able to unload and switch between Full Morphic / SimpleMorphic / Native / HTML interfaces, all backed by ToolBuilder seems very useful. For the HTML interface you could e.g. just add a WebKit plugin.
> 
> Or just serve HTTP in the image and use an off-the-shelf browser.
> OmniBrowser has a web UI that works quite well.

Requiring an external browser is not the same thing, IMHO, as having a desktop UI (even if that uses HTML behind the scenes).

- Bert -