Well, just port morphic to clamato/jtalk then.

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki at vpri.org> wrote:

> At Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:27:30 -0700,
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, it would be great to see more of the good ideas in Squeak and its
> ancestors getting wider adoption. Seeing Morphic on the web is cool, but
> that's somewhat unrelated to Squeak.
> >
> > Having style sheets in Squeak's Morphic would be cool too. The Sophie
> developers used style sheets for their Tweak UI. But I don't think HTML
> would be a good choice for Squeak's Morphic. Implementing a fully compliant
> HTML renderer is Hard, and I don't see the added complexity being worth it.
> >
> > What would be nice though is pursuing the idea of alternative UI kits in
> Squeak - being able to unload and switch between Full Morphic /
> SimpleMorphic / Native / HTML interfaces, all backed by ToolBuilder seems
> very useful. For the HTML interface you could e.g. just add a WebKit plugin.
>
>   Sounds good.
>
>  BTW, you can get the references to JS objects from Google Native
> Client and send messages to them.  We can write a bridge to them, and
> then we should be able to mix the HTML rendered objects and
> Squeak-rendered objects in Chrome.
>
> -- Yoshiki
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20110614/7235c207/attachment.htm