[squeak-dev] SimpleMorphic
Casey Ransberger
casey.obrien.r at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 00:46:44 UTC 2011
Yeah, in Squeak's situation it makes even more sense than it makes in Pharo, because we have a lot of features and applications in our image which the community is strongly aligned against breaking until they can be reloaded as external packages, which I think is admirable and responsible, but makes it really hard to drive Morphic into the future.
SimpleMorphic is nice because we can enjoy our past while slicing off a delicious piece of the future (Cuis' Morphic implementation approaches an ideal in my view, though some features are missing.)
On Mar 6, 2011, at 2:01 PM, "Edgar J. De Cleene" <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/6/11 1:05 PM, "David T. Lewis" <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Edgar,
>>
>> The integration of © as a Squeak project is not
>> complete, so think of this as "pre-alpha". But I'm still working
>> on it, and learning a lot about Morphic in the process :)
>>
>> Dave
>
> Yes , I know.
> A lot of work for having a useful system, but is a giant step having
> SimpleMorphic running.
>
>
> Need re-doing all tools windows.
> Can beg Monticello Browser first ?
>
> My idea is having a no backward compatible system.
> Run in SimpleMorphic on top of Squeak / Pharo cross.
>
> Lots of learning....
>
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|