It's not about ignoring GC, but to add the influence of GC correctly. Some
runs need more time for GC, some don't - even for the same "amount" value.
This means, that not GC itself is a variable to block out, but another
hidden one that influences the time for GC. What you do not want, is to have
"peaks" in your graph that happended by chance, because that doesn't mean
anything for the general morphic performance.

Peaks which occur very often for several runs - not only a few times - would
be VERY interesting though. :)

Marcel--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Morphic-Performance-Graphs-tp3481429p3487398.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.