[squeak-dev] Fork Proposal: Cuis & Killer Apps.
Lawson English
lenglish5 at cox.net
Wed Sep 7 17:16:26 UTC 2011
Cuis is a good partial solution. So is Craig Latta's Spoon.
Better will be developing a GOOD IPC strategy so that we can spawn
dedicated images from Cuis that contain only the code necessary to run a
task in its own process, using Spoon to cull the unneeded classes.
L.
On 9/7/11 9:52 AM, Overcomer Man wrote:
> I suggest a new fork or possibly a new orientation for the next Squeak
> release:
> Adopt Cuis as the core image and focus on killer applications to
> attract new Smalltalk users.
> Thousands of downloads are recorded on CNet for simple apps like a
> voice recorder.
> They could all be using and learning Smalltalk. Same for many other
> applications.
> That would help make Smalltalk popular again.
> Recently I found Squeak / Cuis contains many Sound classes. So I
> wrote up an email suggesting it to a community college teacher friend
> who had asked for a sound recorder. Imagine my embarrassment when I
> found the files Squeak supports doesn't include .mp3.
> Squeak has so much unfinished half starts at programs, why not adopt
> Juan's work to flush the unnecessary, then get started on building a
> serious applications team to build truly useful free code.
> Another example, Roxio is a million dollar software company making a
> video recorder app. which is not as good as an ordinary VCR and not
> supported (they have a staff but try getting any real help). Squeak
> could be capturing a slice of that market and enticing users to learn
> Smalltalk! And source code can substitute for most support.
> Another example, Solid Works is a 3D object drafting program that is
> simple and gets many thousands of users away from AutoDesk. Can
> Smalltalk deliver most or all of that function with a FFI to openGL
> and some programming? Certianly!
> Finally, the one complaint I've heard on the job about Smalltalk is
> it's slow. I recently added several thousand classes and find simply
> clicking on the class in a browser is now slow to respond. When
> end-users, not programmers, can type at 80 words a minute and more in
> a C app. or they can be limited to 30 wpm or less in a Smalltalk app.
> they demand C. The new VM was a good improvement, now try to solve
> the speed issues in the image.
> Thanks,
> Kirk Fraser
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20110907/62a8db15/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|