On 1 August 2012 14:14, Sean P. DeNigris <sean at clipperadams.com> wrote:
>
> Frank Shearar-3 wrote
>>
>> If the changes file were not necessary I
>> could simply not keep it under version control.
>>
>
> Pharo uses wget to download things like the image/changes/sources [1] [2].

Sure. But doing that right now means you use git to get a shell to
download an artifact, which seems... a bit busy. Right now we can
check out the CI environment in its entirety. I guess the current
squeak-ci also helps with bandwidth usage, if that's an issue: you'll
only download a new image once in a while. I don't know if that's a
significant argument either way :)

frank

> HTH,
> Sean
>
> [1]
> https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/job/Scripts-download/ws/pharo-shell-scripts/fetchPharo20.sh/*view*/
> [2]
> https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/job/Scripts-download/ws/download.sh/*view*/
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Changes-file-how-important-tp4642416p4642455.html
> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>