[squeak-dev] squeak.org
H. Hirzel
hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 18:25:51 UTC 2012
Hi Chris
Thank you for taking the time to answer.
On 12/5/12, Chris Cunnington <smalltalktelevision at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-12-04 1:06 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
>> Hello Chris and Darius
>>
>> with the part Darius suggested added 'Take Part In The Innovation'
>> (TPITI) there is now quite some redundancy with the menu at the left.
>> e.g
>>
>> Project Links (Menu) ==> 'Discover Squeak's projects' (TPITI)
>> Documentation (Menu) ==> 'Explore the documentation' (TPITI)
>> Developer Links (Menu) ==> 'Find tools via the developer links.'
>> (TPITI)
>>
>> Web users normally look at the menu and need to to be told so.
>>
>> Maybe the TPITI info and the menu can be combined resulting in a more
>> attractive wording of the menu entries (verb plus object)?
>>
>> This would as well shift up the six boxes below which makes it more
>> attractive at first glance as everything fits on a regular screen?
>>
>> --Hannes
>>
> You'd like to remove the TPITI and style the menu as Smalltalk code. I'm
> not sure either of those is a good idea.
OK, fine. No objection.
Casey wanted more color and I'm
> not sure that's a good idea either. I don't think the webpage should be
> the attraction. A little dull is probably better.
Eeh?
> I figure a site has to work on two levels: immediate impression; and,
> subsequent usefulness. People being people, they like a bit of noise and
> chaos in the immediate impression.
Really?
Where is the noise?
The current squeak.org gives a great
> first impression, because its so busy and colorful. It's utility isn't
> great.
The redundancy of the TPITI, which you see as a defect, I see as
> a contributing to immediate impression. The items in the TPITI overlap
> with the menu and emphasize the menu.
This is my main point. What people see is the TPITI section which is
redundant with a menu which people expect in any case visiting a web
site for an IDE/computer language. The standard things. And the
non-scrollable area at the top isn't used properly either. So the
first impression is to see half-finished redundant stuff and and a
nearly empty horizontal menu.
The important news are obstructed and look like an after-thought.
> I also think that people are attracted by what they can only partially
> see. To give you an example from cinema, a director will often put
> something in the way of an object the audience wants to see to increase
> their desire to see it. An example from Lord Of The Rings - The Return
> Of The King: after much preamble about the witch king of Angmar riding a
> dragon, our first view is obscured by a castle spire. Spielberg does it
> all the time. Obscure to increase curiosity.
This happens with the 6 intro boxes and the 'more' buttons. Very neat.
> My point is that because you can only see half of the six areas at the
> bottom of the screen, your curiosity is nettled, and you scroll down to
> see the rest of the page. Did you not do exactly that, Hannes?
Sure, because I was forced to. Not particularly great.
Isn't
> that what you are protesting against being forced to do?
Yes
You would like
> to see the whole page without having to scroll.
Yes.
I would like to see this
> "defect" as prompting people to interact with the site.
Interaction is good and great but not this type of cheap interaction.
We actually have 6 'more' buttons.
another proposal
Why can-t we move TPITI into one of the six boxes and have a relative
newcomer write a short article how to get into Squeak....?
--Hannes
> Chris
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|