[squeak-dev] RC-3 ready

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 18:07:12 UTC 2012


On 18 December 2012 17:23, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 December 2012 16:59, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In particular, I _cannot_ version the artifact "correctly" at the
>>> moment. I have seen no stamp of approval from anyone regarding my
>>> ReleaseBuilder and Morphic changes, so my release process moves the
>>> latest successful build (which has been tested on the Linux platform)
>>> past trunk. If people are happy with what I've done so far, let's move
>>> the ReleaseBuilder/Morphic inbox submissions into trunk and I'll
>>> continue hacking directly on trunk.
>>
>> With this community, you may regard "no objection within a few days"
>> as a "stamp of approval".  These changes you refer to are preferential
>> in nature, they need to be moved to trunk prior to release.
>
> Do we prefer complete histories - moving Morphic-fbs.(629, 630, 631)
> into trunk - or do we only care about the final result - moving just
> Morphic-fbs.631? (I prefer the latter in my own work, but trunk isn't
> only my repo.)

Sorry, I prefer the FORMER in my work - having complete histories.

> frank


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list