In looking at where one test fails I see that

     MCSnapshotResource current snapshot definitions

is empty in the 4.4 image while it has a bunch of entries in the 4.3 image.

Cheers,
Bob

On 12/19/12 5:44 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 22:15, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Why do you say that's breaking the tests?  If you "Do It" on one of
>>>> the failed MC tests it opens the debugger showing the failed assertion
>>>> even though initials have already been set.
>>> If the author initials aren't set, you get a FITBM asking for it. The
>>> proper cleanup and restoration of MC's test state will thus not
>>> happen. In particular, MCMockClassA does not get its #one method back,
>>> which later tests expect.
>>>
>>>> These tests weren't failing in 4.3 anyone know what happened?
>>> People usually don't run tests without author initials? Certainly
>>> these tests have ALWAYS passed on CI, but CI sets the author initials.
>>>
>>> I have yet to see evidence to contradict my hypothesis.
>> Eh, well I just opened the 4.3 release image and ran tests.  It asked
>> for my initials at the beginning and then ran all tests.  Those MC
>> tests didn't fail.  I don't think we can release without understanding
>> what's going on with them in 4.4.
> Yes, but did you _fill in_ the initials?
>
> At any rate, theories aside, it _is_ the case that the
> MCMethodDefinitionTest >> #tearDown doesn't restore state correctly.
> Note that this is #testLoadAndUnload test is the test that pops up the
> prompt. Subsequent tests fail because, for at least some of them,
> MCMockClassA >> #one no longer exists. (MCMethodDefinitionTest >>
> #testLoadAndUnload removes it.)
>
>> Would someone volunteer?  I'm currently looking at Dave's SqueakMap
>> patch is needed now but not before and making sure we can, in fact,
>> deploy packages for 4.4 that will show up in SqueakMaps 4.4 list.
> Yes, please. I would like some countervailing evidence and/or
> alternate hypotheses.
>
> Nevertheless, these tests definitely run on CI, and definitely pass.
> Have always passed, in fact. It was only glenpaling's recent findings
> that brought these tests to my/our attention.
>
> frank
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20121219/80a697d5/attachment.htm