On 29 December 2012 21:06, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 December 2012 18:49, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>
>>> Other than the fact that the last two builds for SqueakTrunk have hung
>>> - an issue I'm looking into, but wouldn't mind others trying their
>>> luck - are we happy enough with 4.4 that we'd want to ship it?
>>>
>>> My gut feel is (and with my Release Manager hat on), judging by the
>>> low severity of the few reports we're seeing, that we're there. What
>>> do others think?
>>>
>>
>> I think it's time to release it, even though SqueakSSL doesn't like the
>> network changes.
>
> OK. Once I uncover whatever's hanging the SqueakTrunk build I'll yell,
> and we can give the ReleaseSqueakTrunk artifact one more whirl and
> declare victory.

It MAY be that there was an intermittent issue with source.squeak.org
not accepting connections: I saw a ConnectionRefused while trying to
reproduce the hung build locally. That could be because of my flakey
home wifi, but then again (a) such an exception would raise a debugger
and hang the build and (b) the builds have started not hanging [1]. At
any rate, they do log a lot more: the update number, the tests they're
running, and so on.

[1] http://squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunk/83/console

> frank
>
>> Levente
>>
>>
>>> One thing we _don't_ have is an "All-in-one" one-click type installer
>>> for the various OSes. If someone can show me what to do, I can add a
>>> job to spit out such a thing.
>>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>>
>>