Regarding point 2 of the previous mail.

I realize that instead of

Installer ss3
        project: 'FileTree';
        install: 'MonticelloFileTree-Core.squeak43'.

I have to go to
http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/FileTree/
and pick out a file name and then do e.g.

Installer ss3
        project: 'FileTree';
        install: 'MonticelloFileTree-Core.pharo20-dkh.78.mcz'.


Then it files in file. However there is still a problem. See next mail.

--HJH

On 7/19/12, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/13/12, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com> wrote:
>> Hannes,
>>
>> Could I see a little more of the stack to get some context?
>>
>> I should point out that I don't necessarily keep the mcz files up-to-date
>> and that the complete install of FileTree should involve a load from a
>> git
>> repository[1], to get the absolutely latest code.
>>
>> I'd also be interested to know which version of the
>> MonticelloFileTree-Core.squeak43 package that is loaded ...
>>
>> Finally I run tests using travisCI[2] for each push to github, but I test
>> against the image downloaded from [3] (including latest github code for
>> Squeak4.3 branch) and that passing all of the unit tests, with my latest
>> updates...
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/dalehenrich/filetree/blob/pharo1.3/doc/SqueakInstall.md
>> [2] http://travis-ci.org/#!/dalehenrich/filetree/builds/1810028
>
>> [3] http://ftp.squeak.org/4.3/Squeak4.3.zip
>
>
> Dale
>
> I redid the test case
>
>
> Prerequisite:
>
> A pristine copy of [3] using the latest Cog machine on Windows
> http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2559/cogwin.zip (I assume
> the Cog version has no influence, this is just for the record)
>
> The image version is Squeak 4.3 #11860
>
> Steps
> 1) Open a workspace
> 2) Paste in the code from the email from Bert who reports it has worked for
> him.
>
> Installer ss3
>         project: 'FileTree';
>         install: 'MonticelloFileTree-Core.squeak43'.
>
> 3) Execute the code
>
>
> Result
> A walkback.
> The versions collection is empty, see attached screen shot.
>
>
> Suggestions what else to test are welcome.
>
>
> --Hannes
>