[squeak-dev] Re: Squeak release process - CI server

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 11:09:53 UTC 2012


On 26 July 2012 17:30, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> On 26.07.2012, at 07:50, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
>> if we're gonna write
>> shell scripts, keeping them version controlled and
>> universally-contributable-to instead of hidden away on the server might be
>> beneficial.
>
>
> +1
>
> (even if we end up having most of the build stuff in Smalltalk, and the scripts need only be tweaked every other year, not having them under version control is just a bad idea)

https://github.com/frankshearar/squeak-ci contains what ought to be a
sensible environment. I wasn't sure what version of Cog was/is in the
Jenkins Workspace, so I just took the latest release - r2562.

frank

> - Bert -
>
>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list