[squeak-dev] The Inbox: Environments-fbs.3.mcz
Frank Shearar
frank.shearar at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 14:48:25 UTC 2012
On 27 July 2012 15:45, <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
> Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of Environments to project The Inbox:
> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Environments-fbs.3.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: Environments-fbs.3
> Author: fbs
> Time: 27 July 2012, 3:45:30.98 pm
> UUID: f4f0bbda-663d-407b-8dbd-976eb031d247
> Ancestors: Environments-cwp.2
>
> Using a Workspace, if you misspell a classname you get a walkback because Environment doesn't understand #keysDo:. Implementing it results in the desired spelling correction prompt.
>
> =============== Diff against Environments-cwp.2 ===============
>
> Item was added:
> + ----- Method: Environment>>keysDo: (in category 'enumerating') -----
> + keysDo: aBlock
> + "Evaluate aBlock for each of the receiver's keys."
> +
> + contents keysDo: aBlock!
I'm struggling to write a test for this. I thought this would work:
testLookupOfMisspelledClassNamePromptsUser
| griffle |
self createClass: #Griffle.
griffle := env at: #Griffle.
self should: [griffle compile: 'nowTime ^ TimStamp new'] raise:
UndeclaredVariable.
but it doesn't. First it fails because there's no UndeclaredVariable,
but the second time it runs, even though env at: #TimStamp is
KeyNotFound, inspecting the env and evaluating "TimStamp" yields nil.
That's fine if you're in a WorkSpace, which will automatically create
bindings for you, but not so much here.
Or am I misreading my test failure? Could an inspector autocreate the
binding? Even though the env's undeclared is empty, the root
environment's contains #TimStamp->nil.
frank
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|