Chris,

You have to agree that a `package comment` belongs with the package and should travel where ever the package goes ... 

it's still nice to have a place for a package comment in SqueakMap...

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Chris Muller" <asqueaker at gmail.com>
| To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
| Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 9:29:20 AM
| Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Documentation/Comment per package
| 
| > I'm currently "Nay" on what we have in the Inbox because we don't
| > have
| > a useful and intuitive way to *consume* the comment.  Bert's code
| > is
| > more for just updating it.  People will not go to "scripts +
| > comment"
| > just to read package comments.  Until that is addressed, I think
| > the
| > enhancement in the Inbox does not add value exceeding its weight.
| 
| Besides that, we already have a place to produce AND consume comments
| about packages -- it's called SqueakMap.
| 
|