[squeak-dev] SOB minutes - 3/6/12

Casey Ransberger casey.obrien.r at gmail.com
Thu Mar 8 20:53:12 UTC 2012


I shipped Squeak once, but my code contributions to Squeak mainline have been minimal. 

I recommend continuing the practice of allowing anyone who voted last time to vote again.

It's worth noting that I agree with Mr. Cunningham. I think end users, not just developers, should also have a voice.

On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Edgar J. De Cleene
> <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/7/12 2:57 PM, "Chris Cunnington" <smalltalktelevision at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> * a person would be eligible to vote by having shown they¹d made a
>>> contribution
>> 
>> 
>> I think the list should be SqueakSource members who have at less one project
>> and this was active in the last year.
>> 
> This is a great rule to include someone, but shouldn't be our only rule.
> 
> What about people who have directly added to the trunk (either via
> committing directly, or to the inbox?)  What about people who help
> with documentation?
> 
> Heck, what about lurkers that just use Squeak, and want to have a
> chance to weigh in on a board that aligns with how they want Squeak to
> go forward in the future (which is, more or less, where I fall)?
> 
> -Chris
> 


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list