[squeak-dev] Puzzled about Form#stencil

Sebastian Nozzi sebnozzi at gmail.com
Wed Nov 14 19:02:09 UTC 2012


Thanks! That clears it then.

El 14/11/2012, a las 18:23, Bert Freudenberg escribió:

> On 14.11.2012, at 17:57, Sebastian Nozzi <sebnozzi at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I still don't get it... wouldn't it mean that it should be a full
>> white opaque pixel? (I'm no graphics expert)
> 
> No, it's a white pixel with alpha (opaqueness) of 0. Opaque white would be 16rFFFFFFFF, not 16r00FFFFFF.
> 
>> And still, isn't this contradictory?
>> 
>> self isTransparentAt: 0 at 0.   ==> false
>> self colorAt: 0 at 0.       ==> Color transparent
> 
> For historical reasons, only a pixel value of 0 is treated as transparent by BitBlt.
> 
> - Bert - 
> 
>> Thanks again!
>> 
>> Sebastian
>> 
>> 
>> 2012/11/14 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>>> 
>>> sketch305 form bits first hex
>>> ==> '16r0'
>>> 
>>> sketch1737 form bits first hex
>>> ==> '16rFFFFFF'
>>> 
>>> - Bert -
> 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list