On 12-10-13 4:05 PM, radoslav hodnicak wrote:
> That was fun!
>
> I didn't catch the beginning, so what is the core of Tim's idea to 
> have a single process VM? I'm trying to imagine what advantages that 
> would bring, but I'm coming up blank.
>
> rado
>
>
I'm not sure I caught it myself. Something about a single process vm, 
but I thought the vm was already single process. Then I sort of got the 
idea all the processes in the ProcessBrowser would be gone and there 
would be one process. This had to do with... I didn't get it, quite.

Tim, what were we missing?

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20121013/b92d62a4/attachment.htm