[squeak-dev] Monticello and PackageInfo

Colin Putney colin at wiresong.com
Wed Apr 3 20:11:13 UTC 2013


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> If I'm asking why a class should belong in two PackageInfos it's only
> fair I answer why it shouldn't:  Because by the PackageInfo domain
> model mirroring MC's model, they are able to work together better.
> For example, the use-case I cited previously was one-click building
> .sar packages (MaSarPackage on SqueakMap).  Utilities like that are
> much easier to build and maintain when the cardinalities between the
> models match.


A class can belong to more than one Monticello package too.

Colin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130403/95735096/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list