Version bf.95 gets rid of the undeclareds. Let's see how the build server likes that.

I'll try to be more careful, because these ones weren't really necessary, just sloppiness on my part.

- Bert -

On 11.04.2013, at 13:46, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, to be fair this is the right time to push longer term
> work-in-progress stuff in trunk. Frustrated is my usual state :)
> 
> frank
> 
> On 11 April 2013 21:43, Nicolas Cellier
> <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I understand how this can be frustrating for Frank :(
>> His efforts for having the CI server working could supposedly be rewarded by
>> correction of errors and regressions soon after their introduction...
>> Unfortunately, it's precisely the time chosen by Bert and Colin for
>> introducing longer term work in progress in trunk.
>> We are less patient than we used to be :)
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/4/10 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
>>> 
>>> On 10.04.2013, at 05:45, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 10 April 2013 13:42, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11 March 2013 00:11,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Bert Freudenberg uploaded a new version of EToys to project The Trunk:
>>>>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/EToys-bf.94.mcz
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Name: EToys-bf.94
>>>>>> Author: bf
>>>>>> Time: 11 March 2013, 1:11:38.945 am
>>>>>> UUID: 4abe21cf-5215-40c9-8371-07b6a9e09b81
>>>>>> Ancestors: EToys-fbs.93
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bring in some classes and methods from the Etoys image so that project
>>>>>> loading gives a meaningful error, not just 'unknown class'. See
>>>>>> ReleaseBuilderSqueakland>>buildInitialScreen
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> =============== Diff against EToys-fbs.93 ===============
>>>>> 
>>>>> This has several missing classes, I just discovered: SExpElement,
>>>>> EToyExpressionTransformer2 and SugarPropertiesNotification.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I only just noticed now because
>>>>> Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testUndeclared often fails for spurious
>>>>> reasons (discussed at length elsewhere).
>>>> 
>>>> I hit "send" too soon. It bothers me that Bert didn't get told that he
>>>> was about to add missing class definitions. I understand that they
>>>> weren't missing in his image, but it'd be really nice if something
>>>> somewhere could have told Bert "you've forgotten some classes". The
>>>> current "commit and see what CI says" mechanism is suboptimal.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> They're not in my image either. The mechanism to inform me is the
>>> undeclared warning that gets logged to the transcript. And I ignored it
>>> because this is work in progress.
>>> 
>>> - Bert -
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>