This one is dangerous.

It makes monticello directly depend on traits,
and unloading traits wont work no longer, no?

Best
    -Tobias

Am 07.08.2013 um 21:56 schrieb commits at source.squeak.org:

> Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of Traits to project The Trunk:
> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Traits-fbs.297.mcz
> 
> ==================== Summary ====================
> 
> Name: Traits-fbs.297
> Author: fbs
> Time: 7 August 2013, 6:52:54.132 pm
> UUID: 00f10a78-c0a1-a243-a90d-d0a642804ab8
> Ancestors: Traits-fbs.296
> 
> #asClassDefinition, #classDefinitions implementors belong in Monticello.
> 
> =============== Diff against Traits-fbs.296 ===============
> 
> Item was removed:
> - ----- Method: Trait>>asClassDefinition (in category 'monticello') -----
> - asClassDefinition
> -    ^Smalltalk at: #MCTraitDefinition ifPresent:[:aClass|
> -        aClass
> -            name: self name
> -            traitComposition: self traitCompositionString
> -            category: self category 
> -            comment: self organization classComment asString
> -            commentStamp: self organization commentStamp].!
> 
> Item was removed:
> - ----- Method: Trait>>classDefinitions (in category 'monticello') -----
> - classDefinitions
> -    | definitions |
> -    definitions := OrderedCollection with: self asClassDefinition.
> -    (self hasClassTrait
> -        and: [self classTrait hasTraitComposition
> -        and: [self classTrait traitComposition isEmpty not]])
> -            ifTrue: [definitions add: self classTrait asMCDefinition].
> -    ^definitions asArray!
> 
>