Am 10.08.2013 um 08:23 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:

> On 9 August 2013 22:32, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Hi
>> Am 09.08.2013 um 18:34 schrieb commits at source.squeak.org:
>> 
>> 
>> Item was changed:
>> ----- Method: MczInstaller class>>registerForFileList (in category 'services') -----
>> registerForFileList
>> +       Smalltalk at: #MCReader ifAbsent: [FileServices registerFileReader: self]!
>> - -     Smalltalk at: #MCReader ifAbsent: [FileList registerFileReader: self]!
>> 
>> Item was changed:
>> ----- Method: SARInstaller class>>initialize (in category 'class initialization') -----
>> initialize
>>        "SARInstaller initialize"
>> +       FileServices registerFileReader: self.!
>> - -     (FileList respondsTo: #registerFileReader:)
>> - -             ifTrue: [ FileList registerFileReader: self ]!
>> 
>> Item was changed:
>> ----- Method: SARInstaller class>>unload (in category 'class initialization') -----
>> unload
>> +       FileServices unregisterFileReader: self.!
>> - -
>> - -     (FileList respondsTo: #unregisterFileReader:)
>> - -             ifTrue: [ FileList unregisterFileReader: self
>> 
>> Shouldn't those go into Monticello?
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean. Are you asking if SARInstaller should go
> into Monticello? I can see a strong argument for some kind of
> "CodeLoader" package, to be broken out of System. I _don't_ think
> Monticello should hold these though, just because they load code.
> 
> MczInstaller _sounds_ like it belongs in Monticello, but it's actually
> a class that lets you load an mcz without having the Monticello
> package loaded.
> 


Ok, i agree fully with you. :)
Best
    -Tobias

> frank
> 
>> Best
>>        -Tobias
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
>> 
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlIFX+kACgkQcPVIrP6PLKvxrQCggf35KPq1sY0TQqVUCe2Fgbqg
>> PyUAnA3oHFG49NWalMas/3cp/LmQC45n
>> =v+p+
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>