I think getting just one ballot is better.  Simple and clean.


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Ron Teitelbaum <ron at usmedrec.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted.  I'm considering sending
> out the ballots again.  The email will not let you vote again (if you try
> you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good
> reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ron Teitelbaum
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
>> bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Herbert König
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM
>> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
>>
>> Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
>> > 98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort
> of
>> mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get
> on the
>> browser and VOTE.
>> >
>> > Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll
>> (not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
> art that you
>> think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
> your life
>> desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
> to
>> avoid voting? I think not.
>> >
>> >
>> frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such
> threats
>> hanging above my head...
>>
>> Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and
> vote!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Herbert
>>
>
>
>