[squeak-dev] The Trunk: Compiler-eem.248.mcz

Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 22:08:21 UTC 2013


Thanks, Frank.  Fixed.

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 8 February 2013 19:34,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
> > Eliot Miranda uploaded a new version of Compiler to project The Trunk:
> > http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Compiler-eem.248.mcz
> >
> > ==================== Summary ====================
> >
> > Name: Compiler-eem.248
> > Author: eem
> > Time: 8 February 2013, 11:33:58.616 am
> > UUID: c4da1b1b-b487-44bb-b8ef-392432ca421d
> > Ancestors: Compiler-cwp.247
> >
> > Slightly less circuitous generation of methods with temp
> > names.  Since schematic temp names string is computed
> > during generation, best to generate a method and copy
> > it with the computed temp names than generate two
> > separate methods.
> >
> > =============== Diff against Compiler-cwp.247 ===============
>
> It'd be great to automate reporting of test regressions. This (*)
> causes two regressions:
>
> Tests.Compiler.ClosureCompilerTest.testBlockDoitDecompilation [1]
> Tests.Compiler.ClosureCompilerTest.testDecompiledDoitMethodTempNames [2]
>
> [1]
> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/160/testReport/junit/Tests.Compiler/ClosureCompilerTest/testBlockDoitDecompilation/
> [2]
> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/160/testReport/junit/Tests.Compiler/ClosureCompilerTest/testDecompiledDoitMethodTempNames/
>
> frank
>
> (*) "This" really just being "this with high probability" because
> there's currently no indication in Jenkins as to how build N+1 differs
> source-wise from build N.
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130208/5251ecfd/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list