I would like a bug tool integrated into Squeak and per Monticello package.
Could we use Monticello somehow to to report and track bugs ?

Karl


On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:12 AM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:

>
> On 22-02-2013, at 8:50 PM, Colin Putney <colin at wiresong.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Inbox is meant for changes that need review—either contributions
> from developers without direct access to the trunk, or from core developers
> that would like a second set of eyes on the code before it goes into trunk.
>
> I really wish we had enough available eyeballs to review everything. I
> suggest that the most careful review is required for the sort of changes
> that 'core developers' produce. If nothing else it is a way to reduce the
> truck-factor and make sure that things are explained well enough for
> someone not heavily involved in the original work to be able to understand
> what is being done.
>
>
> > So, sure, a Mantis entry is great, but core developers putting stuff in
> the Inbox ought to be fairly rare. The idea is to keep it easy to
> contribute, with minimal ceremony.
>
> No ceremony at all worries me. Call me Captain Slow (cf James May) but I
> like procedures. They're recipes for maintaining sanity over time.
>
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130223/391c9e42/attachment.htm