On 26 February 2013 07:23, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 26.02.2013 um 08:19 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>
>> On 26 February 2013 06:38, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Am 25.02.2013 um 21:27 schrieb commits at source.squeak.org:
>>>
>>>> Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of SMLoader to project The Trunk:
>>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/SMLoader-fbs.78.mcz
>>>>
>>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>>
>>>> Name: SMLoader-fbs.78
>>>> Author: fbs
>>>> Time: 25 February 2013, 9:27:11.959 pm
>>>> UUID: cd8023fe-60a1-4dd9-a7dd-60e8ce7f4ac5
>>>> Ancestors: SMLoader-cmm.77
>>>>
>>>> When installing WebClient, use the most recent version.
>>>>
>>>> =============== Diff against SMLoader-cmm.77 ===============
>>>>
>>>> Item was changed:
>>>> SystemOrganization addCategory: #SMLoader!
>>>> - SystemOrganization addCategory: #'SMLoader-Models'!
>>>>
>>>> Item was changed:
>>>> ----- Method: SMClient class>>installWebClient (in category 'private') -----
>>>> installWebClient
>>>> +     Installer ss
>>>> +             project: 'WebClient';
>>>> +             install: 'WebClient-Core-ar.92.mcz'!
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this be WebClient-Core-ar.92 without the .mcz?
>>
>> Yes, it should, but without the .mcz you'd end up loading
>> WebClient-Core-ar.921.mcz by accident, were there such a version.
>
>
> Then I would like to declare Installer broken. ;)
> Rephrased: This would be unexpected behavior for me

If you raise a bug I'll remember to fix it :) Otherwise my
disease-riddled brain will likely forget.

frank

> Best
>         -Tobias