I would say go for the non-FFI part on the CI for the time being and
leave a note which people will see.

--Hannes

On 2/26/13, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 February 2013 15:21, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/26/13, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2013/2/26 H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com>:
>>>> For the load script for Xtreams in the list archive, which Frank
>>>> mentions, there is one here
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2012-September/165822.html
>>>>
>>>> But it refers to a copy Colin Putney keeps at his wiresong site.
>>>>
>>>> --Hannes
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have time to try, but do you mean that various snippets found
>>> on http://www.squeaksource.com/Xtreams.html are failing?
>>> Or is it just the part requiring FFI?
>>>
>>> Nicolas
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, we need a retest for 4.4
>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/Squeak4.4-12327.zip and current trunk
>> (preferably on the integration server)
>>
>> At the moment I do not have time either to test it. So I put out this
>> email as a reminder for somebody to catch up.
>
> I tried, but ran into problems with FFI (see my mail from earlier
> today). If we can resolve that, I can set up a CI job to test Xtreams.
> (Or, I suppose, just test the non-FFI parts so long.)
>
>> --Hannes
>>
>
>