Agreed, and done:
http://build.squeak.org/job/ExternalPackage-Xtreams/2/testReport/?

frank

On 26 February 2013 15:31, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would say go for the non-FFI part on the CI for the time being and
> leave a note which people will see.
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 2/26/13, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26 February 2013 15:21, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/26/13, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2013/2/26 H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com>:
>>>>> For the load script for Xtreams in the list archive, which Frank
>>>>> mentions, there is one here
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2012-September/165822.html
>>>>>
>>>>> But it refers to a copy Colin Putney keeps at his wiresong site.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Hannes
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have time to try, but do you mean that various snippets found
>>>> on http://www.squeaksource.com/Xtreams.html are failing?
>>>> Or is it just the part requiring FFI?
>>>>
>>>> Nicolas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, we need a retest for 4.4
>>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/Squeak4.4-12327.zip and current trunk
>>> (preferably on the integration server)
>>>
>>> At the moment I do not have time either to test it. So I put out this
>>> email as a reminder for somebody to catch up.
>>
>> I tried, but ran into problems with FFI (see my mail from earlier
>> today). If we can resolve that, I can set up a CI job to test Xtreams.
>> (Or, I suppose, just test the non-FFI parts so long.)
>>
>>> --Hannes
>>>
>>
>>
>