[squeak-dev] Re: Squeak 4.4 Question

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Thu Jan 17 17:11:31 UTC 2013


No, it's not an emergency. It means an ugly hack in my build pack. It is something I want fixed in 4.5 though.

frank

On 17 Jan 2013, at 15:26, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:

> 
> On 17.01.2013, at 02:03, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 17 January 2013 00:22, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 16.01.2013, at 15:39, Yanni Chiu <yanni at rogers.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 16/01/13 6:05 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> And in case this hasn't been mentioned yet, the non-desctructive condense sources is this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Smalltalk appendChangesTo: 'test123.sources'
>>>> 
>>>> So, should 4.4 be re-done, or does this get run from 4.5 onwards.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> That's up to the release manager (but I thought 4.4 was done).
>>> 
>>> - Bert -
>> 
>> 4.4 is done, but of course if bugs are found then they need fixing,
>> which means occasional releases. People using Squeak in anger should
>> be using 4.4, not 4.5, so I expect/hope that we'll get bug reports for
>> 4.4 from people _using_ Squeak, and bug reports for 4.5 from the core
>> devs.
>> 
>> frank
> 
> Yes, but the sources thing isn't really a bug needing an immediate fix, is it?
> 
> - Bert -
> 
> 
> 


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list