On 25.01.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> I like it because it fits my model
> I generally have several changes/experiments on the grill and this is
> a great improvment of efficiency

Right, same here.

> Of course, there is always a danger because we did not commit exactly
> what we tested.
> But we're supposed to know what we are doing.

;)

> It would be even better is cmd+I would select the next item in the
> list (like keep or reject in a merge)

Good point, that would be an improvement.

- Bert -

> Nicolas
> 
> 2013/1/25 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>> On 25.01.2013, at 00:06, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
>> 
>>> Bert Freudenberg uploaded a new version of Monticello to project The Inbox:
>>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-bf.532.mcz
>>> 
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>> 
>>> Name: Monticello-bf.532
>>> Author: bf
>>> Time: 24 January 2013, 4:05:51.496 pm
>>> UUID: 71bddd0f-d5ac-488b-a8e1-729f2a06474e
>>> Ancestors: Monticello-bf.531
>>> 
>>> Save dialog now shows a list of changes to be submitted. Clicking a list item shows a diff in the lower pane. Advanced users can also make this save ignore individual changes using the item's context menu.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please try this to see if you like it better than the current save dialog. I've been using it for a few days and it seemed to work fine. In my workflow I always press the "changes" button before saving anyway, so this saves time. Plus being able to commit even a "dirty" package is something I had wanted for a while.
>> 
>> One change in behavior is that the package snapshot is already taken when pressing the save button, not after accepting the version name dialog.
>> 
>> - Bert -