Yes.

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Douglas McPherson <djm1329 at san.rr.com> wrote:
> If I understand correctly, another difference between a FloatCollection and an OrderedCollection of Floats, besides the noted efficiency due to the use of FloatArray, is that a FloatCollection will store IEEE 32-bit single precision floats, while an OrderedCollection of Floats will store double precision floats. Is this correct? This is analogous to the current difference between an Array of Floats and a FloatArray.
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 02:19 , commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
>
>> Chris Muller uploaded a new version of Collections to project The Trunk:
>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Collections-cmm.499.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: Collections-cmm.499
>> Author: cmm
>> Time: 28 January 2013, 8:19:08.858 pm
>> UUID: 9af9bd27-3342-4203-88e5-22c85c57d5ae
>> Ancestors: Collections-bf.498
>>
>> FloatCollection inherits the convenient add:/remove: API of OrderedCollection, but using an internal FloatArray for better efficiency.
>>
>> =============== Diff against Collections-bf.498 ===============
>>
>> Item was added:
>> + OrderedCollection subclass: #FloatCollection
>> +     instanceVariableNames: ''
>> +     classVariableNames: ''
>> +     poolDictionaries: ''
>> +     category: 'Collections-Sequenceable'!
>> +
>> + !FloatCollection commentStamp: 'cmm 1/28/2013 19:49' prior: 0!
>> + FloatCollctions store 32bit IEEE floating point numbers.!
>>
>> Item was added:
>> + ----- Method: FloatCollection class>>arrayType (in category 'overriding') -----
>> + arrayType
>> +     ^ FloatArray!
>>
>> Item was added:
>> + ----- Method: FloatCollection>>addLast: (in category 'as yet unclassified') -----
>> + addLast: aFloat
>> +     aFloat isNumber ifFalse: [ self error: 'This collection can only store Floats.' ].
>> +     ^ super addLast: aFloat!
>>
>>
>
>