>> I don't see anything at all that takes me to the MCVersionInfo
>> corresponding
>> to a version in the versions browser. Am I missing something?
>
> No.  The "system" is.  As I understand it, the only way to locate an MC
> package version containing the first occurrence of a specific method version
> is to search versions of the MC package in a repository.  One at least knows

If you're doing it manually like that, paging through the in-memory
ancestry history (via the "History" button) is much faster than
opening versions in the repository.

> that the commit date of the MC package is >= the date of the version.  One
> needs to compare two MC packages and verify that the method version doesn't
> exist in the first and does exit in the second.  I've done this manually
> enough to know that it should be automated ;-)

It was automated, many moons ago.  I use this almost every day.

  http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5603



>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:56 PM, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On 17-07-2013, at 7:18 PM, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, tim Rowledge wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Not long ago Character>to: was changed to return a String instead of
>> > >>> an Array. That broke ObjectsTool>alphabeticTabs
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Either we need to fix alphabeticTabs to re-convert the String to a
>> > >>> collection, or rescind the change to Character>to:. It would help if the
>> > >>> rationale for that change were known.
>> > >>
>> > >> The fix is easy, just replace the line causing the bug with this:
>> > >>
>> > >>       tabLabels := ($a to: $z) collect: [:ch | ch asString] as:
>> > >> OrderedCollection.
>> > >>
>> > >> I can't commit now, so please do it.
>> > >
>> > > I had already sent a fix like that to Frank - since he's tearing up
>> > > the system right now and I'm a bit occupied with Scratch modernisation - but
>> > > I'm not convinced it is better than making $a to: $z go back to returning an
>> > > Array. I *know* a String is kinda-sorta an array of characters - but I want
>> > > to be assured that the change didn't bugger up any other methods as a
>> > > side-effect. Why was it done? What efforts to ensure it didn't screw things
>> > > were made?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > tim
>> > > --
>> > > tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> > > Strange OpCodes: YOGA: Exit Finite-State Mode
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> best,
> Eliot
>
>
>