[squeak-dev] error when updating Squeak4.4-12327 to trunk

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Fri Mar 8 09:55:18 UTC 2013


On 7 March 2013 23:25, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 23:11, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> On 2013-03-07, at 23:42, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 6 March 2013 15:59, Ken G. Brown <kbrown at mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Running on COG 2397, and after updating fresh Squeak4.4-12327 Release to
>>>>>> 12332, updating to Trunk  fails at first attempt in the same place, then by
>>>>>> abandoning and trying the update again, it apparently completes to 12511.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Ken G. Brown
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With COG 2678, pretty well the same. First attempt it timed out during
>>>>>>> the same update-nice-223, then trying again from what had already been
>>>>>>> loaded, got the following during the same update, during compiling
>>>>>>> SMLoader-fbs-78 as before:
>>>
>>> What I find strange about all this is that we take a 4.4-12327 image
>>> and whatever the latest Cog is and update it all the way without any
>>> probems quite a few times a day on the CI server.
>>>
>>> frank
>>
>> Looks like it's an intermittent problem, unfortunately:
>>
>> I just updated the new all-in-one-cog to latest trunk, no problem. This is a 4.4-12327 image with Cog VM 2697.
>>
>> I then tried what Ken described: update the fresh image first from the squeak44 stream, then switch to trunk, then update again.
>>
>> BOOM. Cog crash. Didn't save the log unfortunately.
>>
>> Tried again. Update, switch to trunk, update again. No crash. What?!
>>
>> Once more. Update, switch to trunk, update. Crash! See below.
>>
>> Tried yet again, with switching to trunk immediately in a fresh image. Crashes, too, same place.
>>
>> So it does crash, just not always. But it's been more than 50% in my case.
>
> Ah, interesting. The CI jobs, naturally, don't update from squeak44;
> they switch to trunk and update just like that. Which I would have
> thought would make no difference...

Actually, I lie. Here's an example of the CI jobs hitting the same
issue: http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/204/console And further
if you look at http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ and choose to
see the failing tests you'll see times (say around build #184) where
the test failure count is unusually low. And
http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/buildTimeTrend shows grey
streaks where builds die.

frank

> frank
>
>> - Bert -


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list