Couldnt much of this SmallLand stuff go under a Themes package ?
One could have different themes for the style of font and colors ?

Karl



On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 13 March 2013 00:14, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 2013-03-13, at 00:08, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12 March 2013 22:22, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> >>> On 2013-03-12, at 22:11, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Name: Tests-fbs.192
> >>>> Author: fbs
> >>>> Time: 12 March 2013, 10:11:20.038 pm
> >>>> UUID: d8f08adf-5340-44a4-b7c6-3c4e70e36c28
> >>>> Ancestors: Tests-cwp.191
> >>>>
> >>>> * The new Etoys classes brought new dependencies on Compression and
> ReleaseBuilder.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hmm. I thought adding a "*etoys" category to ReleaseBuilderSqueakland
> might be convenient, because then I wouldn't have to touch the
> ReleaseBuilder package directly. If you think that's not a good idea,
> please let me know.
> >>
> >> I don't think these are bad dependencies: I consider Etoys to be
> >> "application level" for want of a better term. Things depending on
> >> Etoys I'd consider a problem.
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> >> Maybe ReleaseBuilderSqueakland should move to a new package,
> >> SmallLand-ReleaseBuilder? There are a few other Squeakland things,
> >> like Preferences class >> #smallLandBigFonts and friends. Those could
> >> go in a new package called SmallLand-Preferences.
> >
> >
> > Squeakland ~= SmallLand.
>
> OK. So there are a few other SmallLand things like Preferences class
> >> #smallLandBigFonts that could go into a new package called
> SmallLand-Preferences :)
>
> > None of the SmallLand stuff is in the Etoys image.
>
> So Etoys have already ripped out the SmallLand stuff? OK, that means
> they're prime candidates for de-trunking (as per our previously
> discussed approach for a stripped core that has stuff loaded in by
> CI).
>
> frank
>
> > I though about making ReleaseBuilderEtoys, but then it felt awkward not
> to have the various release builders next to each other. OTOH, we should
> weed out the unused builders anyway.
> >
> > - Bert -
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130313/c95c0faa/attachment.htm