[squeak-dev] The Trunk: Graphics-tpr.205.mcz

Nicolas Cellier nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 18:06:03 UTC 2013


2013/3/24 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:
> Most probably you moved AbstractFont to another package.
> Could you verify how it is classified? I have :
>
> Object subclass: #AbstractFont
>         instanceVariableNames: ''
>         classVariableNames: 'ForceNonSubPixelCount'
>         poolDictionaries: ''
> --->    category: 'Graphics-Fonts'
>
> If it's not the case, change the category and publish a new version of Graphics.
>
> Also the fact that you published 'nil' instead of an empty postscript
> maked me think you don't have an up to date image, because I think
^H^H^H^H^Hmakes
> Bert solved this one already.
>
> + (PackageInfo named: 'Graphics') postscriptOfRemoval: 'nil'!
>
> Nicolas
>
> 2013/3/24 David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>:
>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:31:08AM -0700, tim Rowledge wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24-03-2013, at 9:29 AM, "David T. Lewis" <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 05:33:13AM +0000, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
>>> >> tim Rowledge uploaded a new version of Graphics to project The Trunk:
>>> >> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Graphics-tpr.205.mcz
>>> >>
>>> >> ==================== Summary ====================
>>> >>
>>> >> Name: Graphics-tpr.205
>>> >> Author: tpr
>>> >> Time: 23 March 2013, 10:32:54.898 pm
>>> >> UUID: a16cf25b-36b7-4a5e-b3e9-3786b5f7c92d
>>> >> Ancestors: Graphics-tpr.204
>>> >>
>>> >> A somewhat involved pile of changes that I'm not 10% sure my use of MC has correctly caught; revert this if you find bugs!
>>> >> For example, MC claims that AbstractFont is very different but visual inspection says not.
>>> >
>>> > Indeed, it looks like this update removes a number of AbstractFont methods.
>>> > I tried loading it and it hangs my image.
>>>
>>> Damn, that's what I was afraid of.
>>>
>>> Thing is, I merged the relevant prior version, added my changes that have nothing at all to do with AbstractFont and saved the end result. At least that leaves me feeling that it wasn't really my fault?
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure what the problem is. I was confused by the "differences" I
>> was seeing immediately prior to applying your update. Unfortunately I'm
>> heading out the door right now and can't follow up on anything, so I didn't
>> want to try to fix something and make it worse. Maybe someone else can
>> have a look and suggest what to do?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list