[squeak-dev] ReleaseBuilder depends on Test

H. Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Mon May 6 09:10:11 UTC 2013


Yes, and then have a #cleanUp method in ReleaseBuilder with a literal
array of classes which needs this message sent to. Before sending the
#cleanUp there needs to be a check if the class is in the image.

--Hannes



On 5/4/13, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 May 2013 00:19, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 May 2013, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>
>>> ReleaseBuilder class >> #prepareNewBuild says
>>>
>>>    MCMockPackageInfo initialize.
>>
>>
>> I guess that's just a failed attempt to clean up some references.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> but I'm not clear on why the ReleaseBuilder needs to clear up test
>>> stuff. If it simply has to, maybe we should move MCMockPackageInfo and
>>> friends into Monticello-Mocks? If we unloaded Test, we wouldn't be
>>
>>
>> That would probably break many MC tests.
>
> How about this then?
>
> MCMockPackageInfo class >> #cleanUp
>     self initialize.
>
> and then remove the offending line from ReleaseBuilder?
>
> (And what about doing the same for TextDomainManager?
>
> TextDomainManager class >> #cleanUp
>     self clearAllDomains
>
> and removing same from ReleaseBuilder?)
>
> frank
>
>> Levente
>>
>>
>>> able to create a release!
>>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list