[squeak-dev] Re: [Pharo-users] the future of squeaksource
Paul DeBruicker
pdebruic at gmail.com
Tue May 7 18:29:56 UTC 2013
I think it would be helpful to have those public open source licensed
projects that are not yet loaded on ss3 or smalltalk hub copied there
for posterity. Maybe make a squeaksource archive account on each
platform that does the copying.
On 05/07/2013 08:19 AM, Andrei Vasile Chis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue
> SqueakSource.
> Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the
> current active users to migrate their projects to the new service and
> then simply put squeaksource in read-only mode (simply exposing the
> directory structure and allowing downloads).
>
> What do you think about it ?
> Are there any good reasons to still keep SqueakSource alive?
>
> Cheers,
> The SCG Team
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|