On 19 May 2013 15:49, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013, Frank Shearar wrote:
>
>> As usual Camillo Bruni is several steps ahead of me. Pharo 3.0 mirrors
>> its source code to GitHub nowadays. In particular, "my" use of github
>> for the build scripts is really "our" use of github for the build
>> scripts, so we should have our own Organization on GitHub.
>>
>> The user/organisation name "squeak" is already taken, so I'm proposing
>> we/I register an organisation called "squeak-project".
>>
>> Any strenuous objections?
>
>
> I'd use squeak-smalltalk, because Squeak is definitely not a project.

Well, "project" has a broader meaning than that given it by
programmers. How about "squeak-software"?

While Squeak may be a Smalltalk now, I don't particularly think we
ought to suggest that it will _always_ be a Smalltalk. It was, after
all, intended to be a vehicle to bring _other_ things int existence.
It's just that Smalltalk, like Lisp, is particularly good at eating
its own children.

frank

> Levente
>
>>
>> frank
>>
>>
>