[squeak-dev] Re: Squeak's presence on GitHub

H. Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed May 29 18:33:42 UTC 2013


I see 11 members and a 'conceal' button besides my entry. No objection
to be listed publically.

--Hannes

On 5/29/13, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
> On 2013-05-29, at 17:04, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 29 May 2013 15:12, Sean P. DeNigris <sean at clipperadams.com> wrote:
>>> Frank Shearar-3 wrote
>>>> One thing that I should note is that it may be the case that
>>>> membership in an organisation is not public by default.
>>>
>>> It seems that it's up to each member. At
>>> https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk?tab=members I see "11 members", but
>>> only
>>> 5 other users listed. I also was presented with a "Publicize Membership"
>>> button, which I immediately and vigorously pushed ;)
>>
>> I think the organization owner can also dictate the visibility: I see
>> "Conceal membership" and "Publicize membership" buttons, as
>> appropriate, for each member.
>>
>> frank
>
> IMHO you should publicize everyone. I see no reason to keep the membership
> secret.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list