www.squeak.org is really in need of some updates. Is there anyone active at
all in the web team ?

Karl


On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:41 AM, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from
> (system integrity is fine again after a series of commits) from
>
>      http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/
>
> to
>
>     http://ftp.squeak.org/4.5alpha/
>
> For convenience. Last one is June 2013.
>
> Edgar did this in the past for earlier versions.
>
> --Hannes
>
>
> P.S. And the existence of
>       http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/
>
> should be announced from time to time or be easy to spot on www.squeak.org
>
>
>
>
> On 11/2/13, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <asqueaker at gmail.com> escribió:
> >
> >>Edgar, what is this?
> >>
> >>I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an
> >>ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak.
> >>
> >>Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released.  This might just be an
> >>updated trunk image..?
> >
> > Try to clarify.
> >
> > People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating to
> > last trunk raise some Monticello windows.
> > So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand
> > updated .image.
> > I do not claim this is ³official².
> > I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different.
> >
> > Sorry if I so some wrongŠ
> >
> > Edgar
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131103/0439482e/attachment.htm