The community would be very grateful for one of you to help us address
these issues.

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:38 PM, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, besides info lacking about build.squeak.org
>
> the download page still references a 4.1 All-in-one download for
> Seaside instead of referring to
>
> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/seaside/Seaside-3.0.8-AllInOne.zip
>
> And one hierarchy level higher there is
> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/Squeak-4.4-All-in-One.zip
> which seems to be older
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 11/3/13, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> www.squeak.org is really in need of some updates. Is there anyone active at
>> all in the web team ?
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:41 AM, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from
>>> (system integrity is fine again after a series of commits) from
>>>
>>>      http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>     http://ftp.squeak.org/4.5alpha/
>>>
>>> For convenience. Last one is June 2013.
>>>
>>> Edgar did this in the past for earlier versions.
>>>
>>> --Hannes
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S. And the existence of
>>>       http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/
>>>
>>> should be announced from time to time or be easy to spot on
>>> www.squeak.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/2/13, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <asqueaker at gmail.com> escribió:
>>> >
>>> >>Edgar, what is this?
>>> >>
>>> >>I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an
>>> >>ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak.
>>> >>
>>> >>Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released.  This might just be an
>>> >>updated trunk image..?
>>> >
>>> > Try to clarify.
>>> >
>>> > People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating
>>> > to
>>> > last trunk raise some Monticello windows.
>>> > So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand
>>> > updated .image.
>>> > I do not claim this is ³official².
>>> > I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different.
>>> >
>>> > Sorry if I so some wrongŠ
>>> >
>>> > Edgar
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>