Oups, I should have read all the answers before responding...


2013/11/22 David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>

> > On 22 Nov 2013, at 16:58, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Yes, you are right there.
> >>> I would think, spinning of a new, small package would be a good
> >>> compromise?
> >>
> >> For THREE METHODS?  My God, PLEASE, no!
> >
> > Bingo! :) But seriously, why do you even care about the number of
> packages in the image?
> >
>
> Because package categories exist for the benefit of human beings who want
> to be able to read and understand the system.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20131122/e609ab8f/attachment-0001.htm