[squeak-dev] The Trunk: Collections-cmm.541.mcz

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 07:29:20 UTC 2013


On 15 Oct 2013, at 22:56, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:

> 
> On 15-10-2013, at 2:40 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> . But we revert the most
>> recent submission, and then say that we reverted the _new_ most recent
>> submission... which was surely the _second_ most recent submission?!
>> 
>> Maybe that block needs to say
>> 
>>   ifTrue: [ |reverted|
>>       reverted := RecentMessages default mostRecent.
>>       RecentMessages default revertMostRecent.
>>       self cr; show: 'reverted: ', reverted printString.
>>       okToRevert := false]
>> 
>> ?
> 
> I *think* you're right. I'm also a bit puzzled why we can't then revert the new most-recent etc and work our way back several bad choices to possible redemption.

I need to fix Transcripter anyway, and make it a serious tool in its own right (and its own package - why oh why is it in Collections?!) so we can add this to the feature list!

Which makes me think that a bug report in a new category is in order, so we can fail to forget this feature!

frank

> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
> 
> 
> 


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list