[squeak-dev] The Trunk: Collections-cmm.541.mcz
Frank Shearar
frank.shearar at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 07:29:20 UTC 2013
On 15 Oct 2013, at 22:56, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>
> On 15-10-2013, at 2:40 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> . But we revert the most
>> recent submission, and then say that we reverted the _new_ most recent
>> submission... which was surely the _second_ most recent submission?!
>>
>> Maybe that block needs to say
>>
>> ifTrue: [ |reverted|
>> reverted := RecentMessages default mostRecent.
>> RecentMessages default revertMostRecent.
>> self cr; show: 'reverted: ', reverted printString.
>> okToRevert := false]
>>
>> ?
>
> I *think* you're right. I'm also a bit puzzled why we can't then revert the new most-recent etc and work our way back several bad choices to possible redemption.
I need to fix Transcripter anyway, and make it a serious tool in its own right (and its own package - why oh why is it in Collections?!) so we can add this to the feature list!
Which makes me think that a bug report in a new category is in order, so we can fail to forget this feature!
frank
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|