Indeed.  OTOH, stdout and stderr ARE kinds of StandardFileStreams so I
question whether the location of _those_ accessors is appropriate, or
whether they should be on StandardFileStream..?


On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 October 2013 20:17,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>> Chris Muller uploaded a new version of System to project The Trunk:
>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/System-cmm.610.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: System-cmm.610
>> Author: cmm
>> Time: 26 October 2013, 2:17:09.114 pm
>> UUID: a27149c5-0fd6-4bef-a34a-57db707aec83
>> Ancestors: System-dtl.609
>>
>> Consider valueWithAllPossibleArguments: special enough to inline, for now.
>>
>> =============== Diff against System-dtl.609 ===============
>
> Why "StandardFileStream stdout" and not "FileStream stdout"? The
> latter is shorter and more abstract.
>
> frank
>